Codechecker has an authentication bypass for certain API calls
CVE-2026-25660GHSA-4v9x-cqc5-j645
What to do
Vendor response not established. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check back for a fix.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
PyPI codechecker
- Affected
- <= 6.27.3
- Fixed in
- no fixed version recorded
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-4v9x-cqc5-j645 lists affected ranges: PyPI codechecker >=0 <=6.27.3
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-4v9x-cqc5-j645 lists affected ranges: PyPI codechecker >=0 <=6.27.3
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS 4.0
- 9.3 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P · score source
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-25660: 0.45% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 38.92 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Summary Authentication bypass occurs when the URL ends with Authentication with certain function calls. This bypass allows assigning arbitrary permissions to any existing user in CodeChecker.
Details The following functions are affected under the Authentication endpoint: `getAuthorisedNames`, `getPermissionsForUser`, `hasPermission`, `addPermission`, and `removePermission`. The vulnerability allows unauthenticated users to execute these function calls with arbitrary arguments. In the logs, the exploit shows as follows: ``` [INFO 2026-04-23 21:23] - 127.0.0.1:42654 -- [Anonymous] POST /v6.67/Authentication@getAuthorisedNames [INFO 2026-04-23 21:23] - 127.0.0.1:42654 -- [Anonymous] POST /v6.67/Authentication@addPermission ```
Impact An attacker with a CodeChecker user can effectively acquire superuser permissions by calling these endpoints.
Patch A patch is available at https://github.com/Ericsson/codechecker/releases/tag/v6.27.4.
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 6 · amended ·
Amended from osv record GHSA-4v9x-cqc5-j645
- Revision 5 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-4v9x-cqc5-j645
- Revision 4 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-4v9x-cqc5-j645
- Revision 3 · amended ·
Reviewed OSV alias/range/CVSS4 correction; package source scopes and original publication preserved. No customer finding resolved.
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Amended from osv record GHSA-4v9x-cqc5-j645
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-4v9x-cqc5-j645
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-25660 Advisory: Codechecker has an authentication bypass for certain API calls IDs: CVE-2026-25660, GHSA-4v9x-cqc5-j645 Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-25660 (revision 6, source checked 28 Oct 2026, 06:10 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Critical (CVSS 9.3) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor response not established. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - PyPI codechecker: affected <= 6.27.3 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `python -m pip show codechecker`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active. ## Supported action No complete vendor fix is recorded. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check this record again before closing anything. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on codechecker. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-4v9x-cqc5-j645 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-4v9x-cqc5-j645 lists affected ranges: PyPI codechecker >=0 <=6.27.3) - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-4v9x-cqc5-j645 (OSV record GHSA-4v9x-cqc5-j645 lists affected ranges: PyPI codechecker >=0 <=6.27.3) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…