NLTK: BllipParser passes caller-supplied model paths to the bllipparser C extension with no pathsec check, enabling arbitrary read
CVE-2026-126295GHSA-fg9w-wfp5-j933
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (nltk 3.10.4), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
PyPI nltk
- Affected
- >= 3.10.0, < 3.10.4
- Fixed in
- 3.10.4
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-fg9w-wfp5-j933 lists affected ranges: PyPI nltk >=3.10.0 <=3.10.3
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-fg9w-wfp5-j933 lists affected ranges: PyPI nltk >=3.10.0 <3.10.4 (fixed)
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 6.8 · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:L
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-126295: 0.29% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 21.87 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-14). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Summary `BllipParser` in `nltk/parse/bllip.py` hands caller-supplied filesystem paths to the native `bllipparser` C extension without routing them through NLTK's `pathsec` validation. The constructor parameters `parser_model`, `reranker_features`, and `reranker_weights`, and the alternative `from_unified_model_dir()` entry point, flow directly to the C extension's `load_parser_model()` and `load_reranker_model()` calls, which open and read the given path at the OS level. Any application that passes an attacker-influenced path to this API reads a file of the attacker's choosing from anywhere on the filesystem, outside the NLTK data roots that every other NLTK tool wrapper confines access to.
Root Cause As of NLTK 3.10.0, `SECURITY.md` documents a centralized I/O security module (`nltk.pathsec`) with strict enforcement enabled by default, under which file-backed resources must resolve inside allowed NLTK data directories. For paths handed to external tools and native extensions…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Amended from osv record GHSA-fg9w-wfp5-j933
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-fg9w-wfp5-j933
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-126295 Advisory: NLTK: BllipParser passes caller-supplied model paths to the bllipparser C extension with no pathsec check, enabling arbitrary read IDs: CVE-2026-126295, GHSA-fg9w-wfp5-j933 Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-126295 (revision 2, source checked 14 Nov 2026, 07:50 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Medium (CVSS 6.8) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: nltk 3.10.4. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - PyPI nltk: affected >= 3.10.0, < 3.10.4; fixed in 3.10.4 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `python -m pip show nltk`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on nltk. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-fg9w-wfp5-j933 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-fg9w-wfp5-j933 lists affected ranges: PyPI nltk >=3.10.0 <=3.10.3) - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-fg9w-wfp5-j933 (OSV record GHSA-fg9w-wfp5-j933 lists affected ranges: PyPI nltk >=3.10.0 <3.10.4 (fixed)) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…