Skip to content

← Actionable
Medium, CVSS 6.1amended

filelock: ReadWriteLock on the hard-link route deletes any directory another user renames onto its .filelock-* link directory name

CVE-2026-112937GHSA-jqc4-5cvw-7w85

What to do

Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (filelock 4.2.1), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.

This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.

Affected packages

  • PyPI filelock

    Affected
    >= 4.1.0, <= 4.2.0
    Fixed in
    4.2.1

Sources

Severity and exploitation
Exploitation
No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
CVSS
6.1 · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
EPSS
  • CVE-2026-112937: 0.16% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 5.42 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description

As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.

ReadWriteLock and AsyncReadWriteLock (the SQLite-backed reader/writer lock) remove their private .filelock- link directories with shutil.rmtree (a recursive delete) on a remembered path. They do not check that the path still names the directory they created. This happens on the hard-link route (a hard link is a second name for the same file). That route is every connection on macOS since 4.1.1 and any POSIX process without a usable /proc/self/fd (a Linux path that names the process's own open files), such as a chroot or container that does not mount /proc. Another local user who can rename entries in the directory that holds the lock database can rename one of the directories of the user running the lock (below: the lock user) onto the link directory's name, or onto a forged dead-holder name. Such a lock directory is a 0777 or group-writable cache, build or project directory without the sticky bit (a directory flag that lets only a file's owner remove or rename it). The lock user's…

Dates and revisions
Published by the source
Last modified by the source
Source last checked
  1. Revision 3 · amended ·

    Amended from ghsa record GHSA-jqc4-5cvw-7w85

  2. Revision 2 · amended ·

    Amended from osv record GHSA-jqc4-5cvw-7w85

  3. Revision 1 · created ·

    Published from ghsa record GHSA-jqc4-5cvw-7w85

Agent brief

Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.

# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-112937

Advisory: filelock: ReadWriteLock on the hard-link route deletes any directory another user renames onto its .filelock-* link directory name
IDs: CVE-2026-112937, GHSA-jqc4-5cvw-7w85
Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-112937 (revision 3, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:56 UTC)
Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected.
Severity: Medium (CVSS 6.1)
Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV.
Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: filelock 4.2.1. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed.

## Affected components
- PyPI filelock: affected >= 4.1.0, <= 4.2.0; fixed in 4.2.1

## Suggested inspection (read-only)
- `python -m pip show filelock`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active.

## Supported action
Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version.

## Required regression checks
- Run the test suite and a production build.
- Exercise the features that depend on filelock.
- Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed.

## Rollback considerations
- Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward.

## Unresolved questions
- Which deployments run an affected version?
- Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority.
- Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production.

## Sources
- Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-jqc4-5cvw-7w85 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-jqc4-5cvw-7w85 lists affected ranges: PyPI filelock >=4.1.0 <=4.2.0)
- Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-jqc4-5cvw-7w85 (OSV record GHSA-jqc4-5cvw-7w85 lists affected ranges: PyPI filelock >=4.1.0 <4.2.1 (fixed))

Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.

Loading voting…