filelock: StrictSoftFileLock creates its claim directories without the lock mode, so another local user with a write bit on them can end a live hold
CVE-2026-112908GHSA-6627-m3xw-93mp
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (filelock 4.2.1), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
PyPI filelock
- Affected
- >= 3.30.0, < 4.2.1
- Fixed in
- 4.2.1
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-6627-m3xw-93mp lists affected ranges: PyPI filelock >=3.30.0 <=4.2.0
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-6627-m3xw-93mp lists affected ranges: PyPI filelock >=3.30.0 <4.2.1 (fixed)
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 5.3 · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
- EPSS
- No dated EPSS signal available.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
`StrictSoftFileLock` and `AsyncStrictSoftFileLock` apply the caller's `mode` to the sentinel (the lock file at ` `) and to both claim files (the files whose presence says a process wants or holds the lock). They create the two directories that hold the claims, ` .filelock` and ` .filelock/claims`, with a bare `mkdir()`. That gives `0o777` filtered through the umask (a per-process mask that removes permission bits from new files and directories) or, under a parent with a default ACL (an access control list on a directory that sets the permissions of entries created inside it), through that ACL. A hold consists of two claim names in that directory, which has no sticky bit (a directory flag that lets only a file's owner remove it). When the environment leaves another local user (the other user below) a write bit on the directory, that user can unlink the holder's `0600` claims. Three settings do this: umask `000` in a sticky directory such as `/tmp`, umask `002` with the other user in…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Amended from osv record GHSA-6627-m3xw-93mp
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-6627-m3xw-93mp
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-112908 Advisory: filelock: StrictSoftFileLock creates its claim directories without the lock mode, so another local user with a write bit on them can end a live hold IDs: CVE-2026-112908, GHSA-6627-m3xw-93mp Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-112908 (revision 2, source checked 29 Oct 2026, 06:10 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Medium (CVSS 5.3) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: filelock 4.2.1. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - PyPI filelock: affected >= 3.30.0, < 4.2.1; fixed in 4.2.1 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `python -m pip show filelock`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on filelock. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-6627-m3xw-93mp (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-6627-m3xw-93mp lists affected ranges: PyPI filelock >=3.30.0 <=4.2.0) - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-6627-m3xw-93mp (OSV record GHSA-6627-m3xw-93mp lists affected ranges: PyPI filelock >=3.30.0 <4.2.1 (fixed)) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…