Skip to content

← Actionable
Medium, CVSS 5.4amended

Vikunja: Explicit lower-permission share on a sub-project is silently overridden by an inherited parent permission (broken access control / privilege-management regression in v2.6.0)

CVE-2026-111920GHSA-pjr3-86v4-5p7w

What to do

Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (code.vikunja.io/api 2.7.0), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.

This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.

Affected packages

Sources

Severity and exploitation
Exploitation
No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
CVSS
5.4 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
EPSS
  • CVE-2026-111920: 0.19% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 8.84 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description

As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.

Description

Summary In Vikunja v2.6.0 the project-permission engine resolves a user's effective permission on a project as the MAX over the entire reachable project subtree. As a result, when a user has been granted a higher permission on a parent project and the owner *explicitly* shares a child project with that same user at a lower permission (an intended down-restriction), the explicit lower grant is silently ignored and the user receives the higher, inherited permission on the child. A user who was deliberately restricted to read-only on a sensitive sub-project can therefore modify it, delete it, and re-share it (including granting other users admin) - none of which the owner intended. This is a behavior regression from v2.5.0, whose engine used "nearest-ancestor-grant-wins" semantics that honored the explicit child grant.

Details Effective permissions are computed by a single recursive CTE in `pkg/models/project_access.go`…

Dates and revisions
Published by the source
Last modified by the source
Source last checked
  1. Revision 5 · amended ·

    Amended from osv record GHSA-pjr3-86v4-5p7w

  2. Revision 4 · amended ·

    Amended from ghsa record GHSA-pjr3-86v4-5p7w

  3. Revision 3 · amended ·

    Amended from ghsa record GHSA-pjr3-86v4-5p7w

  4. Revision 2 · amended ·

    Amended from osv record GO-2026-6745

  5. Revision 1 · created ·

    Published from osv record GHSA-pjr3-86v4-5p7w

Agent brief

Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.

# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-111920

Advisory: Vikunja: Explicit lower-permission share on a sub-project is silently overridden by an inherited parent permission (broken access control / privilege-management regression in v2.6.0)
IDs: CVE-2026-111920, GHSA-pjr3-86v4-5p7w
Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-111920 (revision 5, source checked 29 Oct 2026, 06:45 UTC)
Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected.
Severity: Medium (CVSS 5.4)
Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV.
Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: code.vikunja.io/api 2.7.0. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed.

## Affected components
- Go code.vikunja.io/api: affected >= 2.6.0, < 2.7.0; fixed in 2.7.0

## Suggested inspection (read-only)
- Go code.vikunja.io/api: check the installed version with your package manager.

## Supported action
Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version.

## Required regression checks
- Run the test suite and a production build.
- Exercise the features that depend on code.vikunja.io/api.
- Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed.

## Rollback considerations
- Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward.

## Unresolved questions
- Which deployments run an affected version?
- Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority.
- Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production.

## Sources
- Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GO-2026-6745 (OSV record GO-2026-6745 lists affected ranges: Go code.vikunja.io/api >=0)
- Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-pjr3-86v4-5p7w (OSV record GHSA-pjr3-86v4-5p7w lists affected ranges: Go code.vikunja.io/api >=2.6.0 <=2.6.0)
- Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-pjr3-86v4-5p7w (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-pjr3-86v4-5p7w lists affected ranges: Go code.vikunja.io/api >=2.6.0 <=2.6.0)
- Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-pjr3-86v4-5p7w (OSV record GHSA-pjr3-86v4-5p7w lists affected ranges: Go code.vikunja.io/api >=2.6.0 <2.7.0 (fixed))

Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.

Loading voting…