Skip to content

← Actionable
Medium, CVSS 6.0amended

LiquidJS: ownPropertyOnly bypass for inherited array indices in first/last/join/reverse/slice/compact, .first/.last, negative index, and for-loop iteration

CVE-2026-106120GHSA-fwxr-j5w2-587m

What to do

Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (liquidjs 10.27.2), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.

This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.

Affected packages

  • npm liquidjs

    Affected
    <= 10.27.1
    Fixed in
    10.27.2

Sources

Severity and exploitation
Exploitation
No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
CVSS 4.0
6.0 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N · score source
EPSS
  • CVE-2026-106120: 0.41% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 35.22 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description

As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.

Summary LiquidJS’s ownPropertyOnly option is intended to prevent templates from reading inherited or prototype properties from scope data. With ownPropertyOnly: true, direct access such as: correctly blocks an inherited array index. However, the same inherited value is still disclosed through: Impact This is an information disclosure issue when an application relies on ownPropertyOnly: true to safely render templates over untrusted or prototype-polluted scope data. Object prototype property reads are blocked as expected, but inherited Array.prototype index reads are not consistently blocked. An attacker who can influence prototype state or inherited array-index data may cause templates to disclose values that ownPropertyOnly is expected to hide. Proof of concept Observed behavior Expected behavior When ownPropertyOnly: true is enabled, inherited array indices should be treated as absent, matching the behavior of: Inherited or prototype-provided array-index values should not be…

Dates and revisions
Published by the source
Last modified by the source
Source last checked
  1. Revision 4 · amended ·

    Amended from ghsa record GHSA-fwxr-j5w2-587m

  2. Revision 3 · amended ·

    Reviewed OSV alias/range/CVSS4 correction; package source scopes and original publication preserved. No customer finding resolved.

  3. Revision 2 · amended ·

    Amended from osv record GHSA-fwxr-j5w2-587m

  4. Revision 1 · created ·

    Published from ghsa record GHSA-fwxr-j5w2-587m

Agent brief

Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.

# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-106120

Advisory: LiquidJS: ownPropertyOnly bypass for inherited array indices in first/last/join/reverse/slice/compact, `.first`/`.last`, negative index, and for-loop iteration
IDs: CVE-2026-106120, GHSA-fwxr-j5w2-587m
Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-106120 (revision 4, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:07 UTC)
Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected.
Severity: Medium (CVSS 6.0)
Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV.
Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: liquidjs 10.27.2. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed.

## Affected components
- npm liquidjs: affected <= 10.27.1; fixed in 10.27.2

## Suggested inspection (read-only)
- `npm ls liquidjs --all`: lists every installed copy and version, including transitive ones. Run in the project root after `npm ci`.

## Supported action
Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version.

## Required regression checks
- Run the test suite and a production build.
- Exercise the features that depend on liquidjs.
- Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed.

## Rollback considerations
- Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward.

## Unresolved questions
- Which deployments run an affected version?
- Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority.
- Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production.

## Sources
- Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-fwxr-j5w2-587m (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-fwxr-j5w2-587m lists affected ranges: npm liquidjs >=0 <=10.27.1)
- Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-fwxr-j5w2-587m (OSV record GHSA-fwxr-j5w2-587m lists affected ranges: npm liquidjs >=0 <10.27.2 (fixed))

Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.

Loading voting…