django-haystack: Remote Code Execution via eval() in Elasticsearch Result Deserialization
CVE-2026-105315GHSA-r3hx-x5rh-p9vv
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (django-haystack 3.4.0), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
PyPI django-haystack
- Affected
- < 3.4.0
- Fixed in
- 3.4.0
Sources
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-r3hx-x5rh-p9vv lists affected ranges: PyPI django-haystack >=0 <3.4.0 (fixed)
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-r3hx-x5rh-p9vv lists affected ranges: PyPI django-haystack >=0 <3.4.0
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS 4.0
- 8.7 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N · score source
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-105315: 0.25% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 17.10 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Remote Code Execution via eval() in Elasticsearch Result Deserialization Summary The Elasticsearch backend in django-haystack calls eval() on raw field values returned from Elasticsearch when a SearchField is declared with an indexfieldname alias that differs from the logical field name. During result processing, the backend looks up fields by logical name but Elasticsearch stores them under the alias key; the lookup fails and the value falls through to topython() → eval(). An attacker who can control content that is indexed into Elasticsearch—and can trigger or wait for a search that returns it—achieves arbitrary code execution in the Django application process. CVSS 3.1 Base Score: 8.5 (High). Details Sink — haystack/backends/elasticsearchbackend.py:865: topython() (line ~850) attempts to parse a string value by calling eval() before performing any type-safety check. If the value is an attacker-controlled Python expression such as import('os').system(...), the expression is…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 3 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-r3hx-x5rh-p9vv
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Reviewed OSV alias/range/CVSS4 correction; package source scopes and original publication preserved. No customer finding resolved.
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record GHSA-r3hx-x5rh-p9vv
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-105315 Advisory: django-haystack: Remote Code Execution via `eval()` in Elasticsearch Result Deserialization IDs: CVE-2026-105315, GHSA-r3hx-x5rh-p9vv Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-105315 (revision 3, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:46 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: High (CVSS 8.7) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: django-haystack 3.4.0. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - PyPI django-haystack: affected < 3.4.0; fixed in 3.4.0 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `python -m pip show django-haystack`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on django-haystack. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-r3hx-x5rh-p9vv (OSV record GHSA-r3hx-x5rh-p9vv lists affected ranges: PyPI django-haystack >=0 <3.4.0 (fixed)) - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-r3hx-x5rh-p9vv (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-r3hx-x5rh-p9vv lists affected ranges: PyPI django-haystack >=0 <3.4.0) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…