Nezha Monitoring: Whole-instance DoS in Nezha dashboard: a member can crash the process for every tenant
CVE-2026-100394GHSA-qjpp-gffx-2wm9
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (github.com/nezhahq/nezha 0.0.0-20260721131105-c893aa57867d), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
- Affected
- >= 0.0.0-20260628010923-fd31e5f1b0f8, < 0.0.0-20260721131105-c893aa57867d
- Fixed in
- 0.0.0-20260721131105-c893aa57867d
Sources
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GO-2026-6794 lists affected ranges: Go github.com/nezhahq/nezha >=0.0.0-20260628010923-fd31e5f1b0f8 <0.0.0-20260721131105-c893aa57867d (fixed)
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; not marked as GitHub-reviewed.
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-qjpp-gffx-2wm9 lists affected ranges: Go github.com/nezhahq/nezha >=0.0.0-20260628010923-fd31e5f1b0f8 <0.0.0-20260721131105-c893aa57867d (fixed)
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-qjpp-gffx-2wm9 lists affected ranges: Go github.com/nezhahq/nezha >=0.0.0-20260628010923-fd31e5f1b0f8 <0.0.0-20260721131105-c893aa57867d
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 6.5 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-100394: 0.50% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 42.73 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Summary A single low-privilege RoleMember can take the entire Nezha dashboard offline, and with it every tenant's web UI, REST API, and agent connections, by racing two ordinary operations on their own service. The crash is a nil pointer dereference in the service-monitor worker at service/singleton/servicesentinel.go:601. The worker checks a service exists under one lock and later writes to two pointer-valued status maps under a different lock; a concurrent delete removes the entries in the gap. Because the gRPC server has no recovery interceptor, the worker-goroutine panic kills the whole process. Availability only: nothing is read or modified. Affected versions Confirmed in v2.2.7 through v2.2.10. service/singleton/servicesentinel.go has the same vulnerable implementation in all four releases. The issue is fixed in v2.2.11 and later; users should upgrade to the latest release, v2.3.0. The bug The worker validates an incoming report and later writes it to two status maps, but the…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 3 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-qjpp-gffx-2wm9
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Amended from osv record GO-2026-6794
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record GHSA-qjpp-gffx-2wm9
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-100394 Advisory: Nezha Monitoring: Whole-instance DoS in Nezha dashboard: a member can crash the process for every tenant IDs: CVE-2026-100394, GHSA-qjpp-gffx-2wm9 Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-100394 (revision 3, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 15:32 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Medium (CVSS 6.5) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: github.com/nezhahq/nezha 0.0.0-20260721131105-c893aa57867d. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - Go github.com/nezhahq/nezha: affected >= 0.0.0-20260628010923-fd31e5f1b0f8, < 0.0.0-20260721131105-c893aa57867d; fixed in 0.0.0-20260721131105-c893aa57867d ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - Go github.com/nezhahq/nezha: check the installed version with your package manager. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on github.com/nezhahq/nezha. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GO-2026-6794 (OSV record GO-2026-6794 lists affected ranges: Go github.com/nezhahq/nezha >=0.0.0-20260628010923-fd31e5f1b0f8 <0.0.0-20260721131105-c893aa57867d (fixed)) - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-qjpp-gffx-2wm9 (OSV record GHSA-qjpp-gffx-2wm9 lists affected ranges: Go github.com/nezhahq/nezha >=0.0.0-20260628010923-fd31e5f1b0f8 <0.0.0-20260721131105-c893aa57867d (fixed)) - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qjpp-gffx-2wm9 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-qjpp-gffx-2wm9 lists affected ranges: Go github.com/nezhahq/nezha >=0.0.0-20260628010923-fd31e5f1b0f8 <0.0.0-20260721131105-c893aa57867d) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…