Cybersecurity AI (CAI) vulnerable to Command Injection in run_ssh_command_with_credentials Agent tool
CVE-2025-67511GHSA-4c65-9gqf-4w8h
What to do
Vendor response not established. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check back for a fix.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
PyPI cai-framework
- Affected
- <= 0.5.9
- Fixed in
- no fixed version recorded
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-4c65-9gqf-4w8h lists affected ranges: PyPI cai-framework >=0 <=0.5.9
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-4c65-9gqf-4w8h lists affected ranges: PyPI cai-framework >=0 <=0.5.9
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 9.6 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
- EPSS
- CVE-2025-67511: 2.02% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 80.99 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Summary A command injection vulnerability is present in the function tool runsshcommandwithcredentials() available to AI agents. Details This is the source code of the function tool runsshcommandwithcredentials() (code): Note how only password and command inputs are escaped to prevent shell injection; while username, host and port values are left injectable. PoC Create an index.html file with the following content: Serve the file using a web server, as example: Launch cai framework: <br <img width="1913" height="929" alt="poc1" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/faf33665-a014-4081-a847-cc15741d0333" / <br <img width="1913" height="929" alt="poc2" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e0d3f762-4293-4373-8903-d4f4daedbd45" / <br <br As result we successfully created the file /tmp/username, but not /tmp/password (since shell injection prevention is applied). <img width="898" height="139" alt="poc3"…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 3 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-4c65-9gqf-4w8h
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Amended from osv record GHSA-4c65-9gqf-4w8h
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-4c65-9gqf-4w8h
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2025-67511 Advisory: Cybersecurity AI (CAI) vulnerable to Command Injection in run_ssh_command_with_credentials Agent tool IDs: CVE-2025-67511, GHSA-4c65-9gqf-4w8h Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2025-67511 (revision 3, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:36 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Critical (CVSS 9.6) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor response not established. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - PyPI cai-framework: affected <= 0.5.9 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `python -m pip show cai-framework`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active. ## Supported action No complete vendor fix is recorded. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check this record again before closing anything. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on cai-framework. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-4c65-9gqf-4w8h (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-4c65-9gqf-4w8h lists affected ranges: PyPI cai-framework >=0 <=0.5.9) - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-4c65-9gqf-4w8h (OSV record GHSA-4c65-9gqf-4w8h lists affected ranges: PyPI cai-framework >=0 <=0.5.9) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…