esm.sh CDN service has JS Template Literal Injection in CSS-to-JavaScript
CVE-2025-65026GHSA-hcpf-qv9m-vfgp
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (github.com/esm-dev/esm.sh 0.0.0-20251118065157-87d2f6497574), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
- Affected
- < 0.0.0-20251118065157-87d2f6497574
- Fixed in
- 0.0.0-20251118065157-87d2f6497574
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-hcpf-qv9m-vfgp lists affected ranges: Go github.com/esm-dev/esm.sh >=0 <0.0.0-20251118065157-87d2f6497574
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 6.1 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
- EPSS
- CVE-2025-65026: 0.51% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 43.89 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Summary The esm.sh CDN service contains a Template Literal Injection vulnerability (CWE-94) in its CSS-to-JavaScript module conversion feature. When a CSS file is requested with the ?module query parameter, esm.sh converts it to a JavaScript module by embedding the CSS content directly into a template literal without proper sanitization. An attacker can inject malicious JavaScript code using ${...} expressions within CSS files, which will execute when the module is imported by victim applications. This enables Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in browsers and Remote Code Execution (RCE) in Electron applications. Root Cause: The CSS module conversion logic (router.go:1112-1119) performs incomplete sanitization - it only checks for backticks (\) but fails to escape template literal expressions (${...}), allowing arbitrary JavaScript execution when the CSS content is inserted into a template literal string. Details File: server/router.go Lines: 1112-1119 When CSS does not contain backticks,…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-hcpf-qv9m-vfgp
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2025-65026 Advisory: esm.sh CDN service has JS Template Literal Injection in CSS-to-JavaScript IDs: CVE-2025-65026, GHSA-hcpf-qv9m-vfgp Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2025-65026 (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 15:13 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Medium (CVSS 6.1) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: github.com/esm-dev/esm.sh 0.0.0-20251118065157-87d2f6497574. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - Go github.com/esm-dev/esm.sh: affected < 0.0.0-20251118065157-87d2f6497574; fixed in 0.0.0-20251118065157-87d2f6497574 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - Go github.com/esm-dev/esm.sh: check the installed version with your package manager. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on github.com/esm-dev/esm.sh. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-hcpf-qv9m-vfgp (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-hcpf-qv9m-vfgp lists affected ranges: Go github.com/esm-dev/esm.sh >=0 <0.0.0-20251118065157-87d2f6497574) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…