Authlib is vulnerable to Denial of Service via Oversized JOSE Segments
CVE-2025-61920GHSA-pq5p-34cr-23v9
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (authlib 1.6.5), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
PyPI authlib
- Affected
- < 1.6.5
- Fixed in
- 1.6.5
Sources
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-pq5p-34cr-23v9 lists affected ranges: PyPI authlib >=0 <1.6.5 (fixed)
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-pq5p-34cr-23v9 lists affected ranges: PyPI authlib >=0 <1.6.5
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 7.5 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
- EPSS
- CVE-2025-61920: 0.64% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 50.64 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Summary Authlib’s JOSE implementation accepts unbounded JWS/JWT header and signature segments. A remote attacker can craft a token whose base64url‑encoded header or signature spans hundreds of megabytes. During verification, Authlib decodes and parses the full input before it is rejected, driving CPU and memory consumption to hostile levels and enabling denial of service. Impact - Attack vector: unauthenticated network attacker submits a malicious JWS/JWT. - Effect: base64 decode + JSON/crypto processing of huge buffers pegs CPU and allocates large amounts of RAM; a single request can exhaust service capacity. - Observed behaviour: on a test host, the legacy code verified a 500 MB header, consuming ~4 GB RSS and ~9 s CPU before failing. - Severity: High. CVSS v3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H (7.5). Affected Versions Authlib ≤ 1.6.3 (and earlier) when verifying JWS/JWT tokens. Later snapshots with 256 KB header/signature limits are not affected. Proof of concept Local demo…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-pq5p-34cr-23v9
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record GHSA-pq5p-34cr-23v9
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2025-61920 Advisory: Authlib is vulnerable to Denial of Service via Oversized JOSE Segments IDs: CVE-2025-61920, GHSA-pq5p-34cr-23v9 Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2025-61920 (revision 2, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:35 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: High (CVSS 7.5) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: authlib 1.6.5. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - PyPI authlib: affected < 1.6.5; fixed in 1.6.5 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `python -m pip show authlib`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on authlib. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-pq5p-34cr-23v9 (OSV record GHSA-pq5p-34cr-23v9 lists affected ranges: PyPI authlib >=0 <1.6.5 (fixed)) - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-pq5p-34cr-23v9 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-pq5p-34cr-23v9 lists affected ranges: PyPI authlib >=0 <1.6.5) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…