Juju zip slip vulnerability via authenticated endpoint
CVE-2025-53513GHSA-24ch-w38v-xmh8
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (github.com/juju/juju 0.0.0-20250619215741-6356e984b82a), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
- Affected
- < 0.0.0-20250619215741-6356e984b82a
- Fixed in
- 0.0.0-20250619215741-6356e984b82a
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-24ch-w38v-xmh8 lists affected ranges: Go github.com/juju/juju >=0 <0.0.0-20250619215741-6356e984b82a
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 8.8 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- EPSS
- CVE-2025-53513: 0.78% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 55.86 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Impact Any user with a Juju account on a controller can upload a charm to the /charms endpoint. No specific permissions are required - it's just sufficient for the user to exist in the controller user database. A charm which exploits the zip slip vulnerability may be used to allow such a user to get access to a machine running a unit using the affected charm. Details A controller exposes three charm-related HTTP API endpoints, as follows: - PUT/GET https://<controller-ip:17070/model-<model-uuid/charms/<nameofcharm-<hashofcharm - POST/GET https://<controller-ip:17070/model-<model-uuid/charms - GET https://<controller-ip:17070/charms These endpoints require Basic HTTP authentication credentials and will accept any valid user within the context of the controller. A user that has no specific permission or access granted can call all of these APIs. To reproduce: Download the ZIP file of an arbitrary charm eg https://github.com/juju/hello-juju-charm Download and install the following tool:…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-24ch-w38v-xmh8
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2025-53513 Advisory: Juju zip slip vulnerability via authenticated endpoint IDs: CVE-2025-53513, GHSA-24ch-w38v-xmh8 Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2025-53513 (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 15:10 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: High (CVSS 8.8) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: github.com/juju/juju 0.0.0-20250619215741-6356e984b82a. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - Go github.com/juju/juju: affected < 0.0.0-20250619215741-6356e984b82a; fixed in 0.0.0-20250619215741-6356e984b82a ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - Go github.com/juju/juju: check the installed version with your package manager. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on github.com/juju/juju. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-24ch-w38v-xmh8 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-24ch-w38v-xmh8 lists affected ranges: Go github.com/juju/juju >=0 <0.0.0-20250619215741-6356e984b82a) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…