MS SWIFT Remote Code Execution via unsafe PyYAML deserialization
CVE-2025-50460GHSA-fm6c-f59h-7mmg
What to do
Vendor response not established. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check back for a fix.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
PyPI ms-swift
- Affected
- <= 3.6.3
- Fixed in
- no fixed version recorded
Sources
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-fm6c-f59h-7mmg lists affected ranges: PyPI ms-swift >=0 <=3.6.3
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-fm6c-f59h-7mmg lists affected ranges: PyPI ms-swift >=0 <=3.6.3
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS 4.0
- 2.3 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N · score source
- EPSS
- CVE-2025-50460: 2.88% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 86.89 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Description A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in the modelscope/ms-swift project due to unsafe use of yaml.load() in combination with vulnerable versions of the PyYAML library (≤ 5.3.1). The issue resides in the tests/run.py script, where a user-supplied YAML configuration file is deserialized using yaml.load() with yaml.FullLoader. If an attacker can control or replace the YAML configuration file provided to the --runconfig argument, they may inject a malicious payload that results in arbitrary code execution. Affected Repository - Project: modelscope/ms-swift - Affect versions: latest - File: tests/run.py - GitHub Permalink: https://github.com/modelscope/ms-swift/blob/e02ebfdf34f979bbdba9d935acc1689f8d227b38/tests/run.py#L420 - Dependency: PyYAML <= 5.3.1 Vulnerable Code Proof of Concept (PoC) Step 1: Create malicious YAML file (exploit.yaml) Step 2: Execute with vulnerable PyYAML (<= 5.3.1) This results in execution of os.system, proving code execution. Mitigation…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 3 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-fm6c-f59h-7mmg
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Reviewed OSV alias/range/CVSS4 correction; package source scopes and original publication preserved. No customer finding resolved.
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record GHSA-fm6c-f59h-7mmg
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2025-50460 Advisory: MS SWIFT Remote Code Execution via unsafe PyYAML deserialization IDs: CVE-2025-50460, GHSA-fm6c-f59h-7mmg Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2025-50460 (revision 3, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:32 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Low (CVSS 2.3) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor response not established. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - PyPI ms-swift: affected <= 3.6.3 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `python -m pip show ms-swift`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active. ## Supported action No complete vendor fix is recorded. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check this record again before closing anything. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on ms-swift. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-fm6c-f59h-7mmg (OSV record GHSA-fm6c-f59h-7mmg lists affected ranges: PyPI ms-swift >=0 <=3.6.3) - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-fm6c-f59h-7mmg (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-fm6c-f59h-7mmg lists affected ranges: PyPI ms-swift >=0 <=3.6.3) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…