Skip to content

← Actionable
Medium, CVSS 4.0

In Cilium, packets from terminating endpoints may not be encrypted in Wireguard-enabled clusters

CVE-2025-32793GHSA-5vxx-c285-pcq4

What to do

Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (github.com/cilium/cilium 1.17.3, 1.16.9, 1.15.16), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.

This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.

Affected packages

  • Go github.com/cilium/cilium

    Affected
    >= 1.13.0, < 1.15.16>= 1.16.0, < 1.16.9>= 1.17.0, < 1.17.3
    Fixed in
    1.15.16, 1.16.9, 1.17.3

Sources

Severity and exploitation
Exploitation
No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
CVSS
4.0 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
EPSS
  • CVE-2025-32793: 0.14% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 3.58 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description

As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.

Impact When using Wireguard transparent encryption in a Cilium cluster, packets that originate from a terminating endpoint can leave the source node without encryption due to a race condition in how traffic is processed by Cilium. Patches This issue has been patched in https://github.com/cilium/cilium/pull/38592. This issue affects: - Cilium v1.15 between v1.15.0 and v1.15.15 inclusive - Cilium v1.16 between v1.16.0 and v1.16.8 inclusive - Cilium v1.17 between v1.17.0 and v1.17.2 inclusive This issue is fixed in: - Cilium v1.15.16 - Cilium v1.16.9 - Cilium v1.17.3 Workarounds There is no workaround to this issue. Acknowledgements The Cilium community has worked together with members of Isovalent to prepare these mitigations. Special thanks to @gandro and @pippolo84 for reporting this issue and to @julianwiedmann for the patch. For more information If you think you have found a vulnerability affecting Cilium, we strongly encourage you to report it to our security mailing list at…

Dates and revisions
Published by the source
Last modified by the source
Source last checked
  1. Revision 1 · created ·

    Published from ghsa record GHSA-5vxx-c285-pcq4

Agent brief

Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.

# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2025-32793

Advisory: In Cilium, packets from terminating endpoints may not be encrypted in Wireguard-enabled clusters
IDs: CVE-2025-32793, GHSA-5vxx-c285-pcq4
Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2025-32793 (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 15:09 UTC)
Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected.
Severity: Medium (CVSS 4.0)
Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV.
Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: github.com/cilium/cilium 1.17.3, 1.16.9, 1.15.16. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed.

## Affected components
- Go github.com/cilium/cilium: affected >= 1.13.0, < 1.15.16; >= 1.16.0, < 1.16.9; >= 1.17.0, < 1.17.3; fixed in 1.15.16, 1.16.9, 1.17.3

## Suggested inspection (read-only)
- Go github.com/cilium/cilium: check the installed version with your package manager.

## Supported action
Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version.

## Required regression checks
- Run the test suite and a production build.
- Exercise the features that depend on github.com/cilium/cilium.
- Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed.

## Rollback considerations
- Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward.

## Unresolved questions
- Which deployments run an affected version?
- Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority.
- Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production.

## Sources
- Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-5vxx-c285-pcq4 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-5vxx-c285-pcq4 lists affected ranges: Go github.com/cilium/cilium >=1.13.0 =1.16.0 =1.17.0 <1.17.3)

Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.

Loading voting…