Neo4j Cypher MCP server is vulnerable to DNS rebinding
CVE-2025-10193GHSA-vcqx-v2mg-7chx
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (mcp-neo4j-cypher 0.4.0), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
PyPI mcp-neo4j-cypher
- Affected
- >= 0.2.2, < 0.4.0
- Fixed in
- 0.4.0
Sources
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-vcqx-v2mg-7chx lists affected ranges: PyPI mcp-neo4j-cypher >=0.2.2 <0.4.0 (fixed)
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-vcqx-v2mg-7chx lists affected ranges: PyPI mcp-neo4j-cypher >=0.2.2 <0.4.0
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS 4.0
- 7.4 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N · score source
- EPSS
- CVE-2025-10193: 0.22% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 12.69 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Impact DNS rebinding vulnerability in Neo4j Cypher MCP server allows malicious websites to bypass Same-Origin Policy protections and execute unauthorised tool invocations against locally running Neo4j MCP instances. The attack relies on the user being enticed to visit a malicious website and spend sufficient time there for DNS rebinding to succeed. Patches CORS Middleware added to Cypher MCP server v0.4.0 that blocks all web-based access by default. Workarounds If you cannot upgrade to v0.4.0 and above, use stdio mode. References Vendor Advisory https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10193 Credits We want to publicly recognize the contribution of Evan Harris from mcpsec.dev for reporting this issue and following the responsible disclosure policy.
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 3 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-vcqx-v2mg-7chx
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Reviewed OSV alias/range/CVSS4 correction; package source scopes and original publication preserved. No customer finding resolved.
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record GHSA-vcqx-v2mg-7chx
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2025-10193 Advisory: Neo4j Cypher MCP server is vulnerable to DNS rebinding IDs: CVE-2025-10193, GHSA-vcqx-v2mg-7chx Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2025-10193 (revision 3, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:35 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: High (CVSS 7.4) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: mcp-neo4j-cypher 0.4.0. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - PyPI mcp-neo4j-cypher: affected >= 0.2.2, < 0.4.0; fixed in 0.4.0 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `python -m pip show mcp-neo4j-cypher`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on mcp-neo4j-cypher. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-vcqx-v2mg-7chx (OSV record GHSA-vcqx-v2mg-7chx lists affected ranges: PyPI mcp-neo4j-cypher >=0.2.2 <0.4.0 (fixed)) - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-vcqx-v2mg-7chx (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-vcqx-v2mg-7chx lists affected ranges: PyPI mcp-neo4j-cypher >=0.2.2 <0.4.0) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…