Pulp incorrectly assigns RBAC permissions in tasks that create objects
CVE-2024-7143GHSA-9m5j-4xx9-44j9
What to do
Vendor response not established. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check back for a fix.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
PyPI pulpcore
- Affected
- <= 3.56.0
- Fixed in
- no fixed version recorded
Sources
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-9m5j-4xx9-44j9 lists affected ranges: PyPI pulpcore >=0 <=3.56.0
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-9m5j-4xx9-44j9 lists affected ranges: PyPI pulpcore >=0 <=3.56.0
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS 4.0
- 8.6 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N · score source
- EPSS
- CVE-2024-7143: 0.60% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 48.98 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
A flaw was found in the Pulp package. When a role-based access control (RBAC) object in Pulp is set to assign permissions on its creation, it uses the AutoAddObjPermsMixin (typically the addrolesforobjectcreator method). This method finds the object creator by checking the current authenticated user. For objects that are created within a task, this current user is set by the first user with any permissions on the task object. This means the oldest user with model/domain-level task permissions will always be set as the current user of a task, even if they didn't dispatch the task. Therefore, all objects created in tasks will have their permissions assigned to this oldest user, and the creating user will receive nothing.
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 3 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-9m5j-4xx9-44j9
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Reviewed OSV alias/range/CVSS4 correction; package source scopes and original publication preserved. No customer finding resolved.
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record GHSA-9m5j-4xx9-44j9
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2024-7143 Advisory: Pulp incorrectly assigns RBAC permissions in tasks that create objects IDs: CVE-2024-7143, GHSA-9m5j-4xx9-44j9 Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2024-7143 (revision 3, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:37 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: High (CVSS 8.6) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor response not established. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - PyPI pulpcore: affected <= 3.56.0 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `python -m pip show pulpcore`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active. ## Supported action No complete vendor fix is recorded. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check this record again before closing anything. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on pulpcore. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-9m5j-4xx9-44j9 (OSV record GHSA-9m5j-4xx9-44j9 lists affected ranges: PyPI pulpcore >=0 <=3.56.0) - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-9m5j-4xx9-44j9 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-9m5j-4xx9-44j9 lists affected ranges: PyPI pulpcore >=0 <=3.56.0) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…