Skip to content

← Actionable
High, CVSS 8.9amended

Pycel allows code injection via a crafted formula

CVE-2024-53924GHSA-pw67-xjhq-389w

What to do

Vendor response not established. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check back for a fix.

This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.

Affected packages

  • PyPI pycel

    Affected
    <= 1.0b30
    Fixed in
    no fixed version recorded

Sources

Severity and exploitation
Exploitation
No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
CVSS 4.0
8.9 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P · score source
EPSS
  • CVE-2024-53924: 0.99% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 62.59 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description

As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.

Pycel through 1.0b30, when operating on an untrusted spreadsheet, allows code execution via a crafted formula in a cell, such as one beginning with the =IF(A1=200, eval("import('os').system( substring.

Dates and revisions
Published by the source
Last modified by the source
Source last checked
  1. Revision 3 · amended ·

    Amended from ghsa record GHSA-pw67-xjhq-389w

  2. Revision 2 · amended ·

    Reviewed OSV alias/range/CVSS4 correction; package source scopes and original publication preserved. No customer finding resolved.

  3. Revision 1 · created ·

    Published from osv record GHSA-pw67-xjhq-389w

Agent brief

Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.

# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2024-53924

Advisory: Pycel allows code injection via a crafted formula
IDs: CVE-2024-53924, GHSA-pw67-xjhq-389w
Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2024-53924 (revision 3, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:44 UTC)
Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected.
Severity: High (CVSS 8.9)
Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV.
Vendor response: Vendor response not established. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed.

## Affected components
- PyPI pycel: affected <= 1.0b30

## Suggested inspection (read-only)
- `python -m pip show pycel`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active.

## Supported action
No complete vendor fix is recorded. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check this record again before closing anything.

## Required regression checks
- Run the test suite and a production build.
- Exercise the features that depend on pycel.
- Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed.

## Rollback considerations
- Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward.

## Unresolved questions
- Which deployments run an affected version?
- Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority.
- Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production.

## Sources
- Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-pw67-xjhq-389w (OSV record GHSA-pw67-xjhq-389w lists affected ranges: PyPI pycel >=0 <=1.0b30)
- Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-pw67-xjhq-389w (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-pw67-xjhq-389w lists affected ranges: PyPI pycel >=0 <=1.0b30)

Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.

Loading voting…