Skip to content

← Actionable
High, CVSS 7.2amended

litellm passes untrusted data to eval function without sanitization

CVE-2024-4264GHSA-7ggm-4rjg-594w

What to do

Vendor response not established. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check back for a fix.

This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.

Affected packages

  • PyPI litellm

    Affected
    <= 1.28.11
    Fixed in
    no fixed version recorded

Sources

Severity and exploitation
Exploitation
No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
CVSS
7.2 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS
  • CVE-2024-4264: 0.88% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 59.25 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description

As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.

A remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in the berriai/litellm project due to improper control of the generation of code when using the eval function unsafely in the litellm.getsecret() method. Specifically, when the server utilizes Google KMS, untrusted data is passed to the eval function without any sanitization. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious values into environment variables through the /config/update endpoint, which allows for the update of settings in proxyserverconfig.yaml.

Dates and revisions
Published by the source
Last modified by the source
Source last checked
  1. Revision 2 · amended ·

    Amended from ghsa record GHSA-7ggm-4rjg-594w

  2. Revision 1 · created ·

    Published from osv record GHSA-7ggm-4rjg-594w

Agent brief

Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.

# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2024-4264

Advisory: litellm passes untrusted data to `eval` function without sanitization
IDs: CVE-2024-4264, GHSA-7ggm-4rjg-594w
Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2024-4264 (revision 2, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:13 UTC)
Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected.
Severity: High (CVSS 7.2)
Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV.
Vendor response: Vendor response not established. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed.

## Affected components
- PyPI litellm: affected <= 1.28.11

## Suggested inspection (read-only)
- `python -m pip show litellm`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active.

## Supported action
No complete vendor fix is recorded. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check this record again before closing anything.

## Required regression checks
- Run the test suite and a production build.
- Exercise the features that depend on litellm.
- Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed.

## Rollback considerations
- Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward.

## Unresolved questions
- Which deployments run an affected version?
- Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority.
- Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production.

## Sources
- Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-7ggm-4rjg-594w (OSV record GHSA-7ggm-4rjg-594w lists affected ranges: PyPI litellm >=0 <=1.28.11)
- Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-7ggm-4rjg-594w (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-7ggm-4rjg-594w lists affected ranges: PyPI litellm >=0 <=1.28.11)

Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.

Loading voting…