Skip to content
Patch Next
Sign inAdd to your agent

← Actionable
Critical, CVSS 9.8amended

SQL injection in llama-index

CVE-2024-23751GHSA-2jxw-4hm4-6w87

What to do

Vendor response not established. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check back for a fix.

This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.

Add to your agent

Affected packages

  • PyPI llama-index

    Affected
    <= 0.9.35
    Fixed in
    no fixed version recorded

Sources

Severity and exploitation
Exploitation
No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
CVSS
9.8 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS
  • CVE-2024-23751: 0.66% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 51.60 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description

As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.

LlamaIndex (aka llamaindex) through 0.9.35 allows SQL injection via the Text-to-SQL feature in NLSQLTableQueryEngine, SQLTableRetrieverQueryEngine, NLSQLRetriever, RetrieverQueryEngine, and PGVectorSQLQueryEngine. For example, an attacker might be able to delete this year's student records via "Drop the Students table" within English language input.

Dates and revisions
Published by the source
Last modified by the source
Source last checked
  1. Revision 2 · amended ·

    Amended from ghsa record GHSA-2jxw-4hm4-6w87

  2. Revision 1 · created ·

    Published from osv record GHSA-2jxw-4hm4-6w87

Agent brief

Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.

# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2024-23751

Advisory: SQL injection in llama-index
IDs: CVE-2024-23751, GHSA-2jxw-4hm4-6w87
Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2024-23751 (revision 2, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:12 UTC)
Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected.
Severity: Critical (CVSS 9.8)
Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV.
Vendor response: Vendor response not established. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed.

## Affected components
- PyPI llama-index: affected <= 0.9.35

## Suggested inspection (read-only)
- `python -m pip show llama-index`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active.

## Supported action
No complete vendor fix is recorded. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check this record again before closing anything.

## Required regression checks
- Run the test suite and a production build.
- Exercise the features that depend on llama-index.
- Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed.

## Rollback considerations
- Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward.

## Unresolved questions
- Which deployments run an affected version?
- Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority.
- Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production.

## Sources
- Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-2jxw-4hm4-6w87 (OSV record GHSA-2jxw-4hm4-6w87 lists affected ranges: PyPI llama-index >=0 <=0.9.35)
- Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-2jxw-4hm4-6w87 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-2jxw-4hm4-6w87 lists affected ranges: PyPI llama-index >=0 <=0.9.35)

Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.

Loading voting…