Ursa CL-Signatures Revocation allows verifiers to generate unique identifiers for holders
CVE-2024-22192GHSA-6698-mhxx-r84g
What to do
Partial vendor fix. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check back for a fix.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
crates.io ursa
- Affected
- <= 0.3.7
- Fixed in
- no fixed version recorded
crates.io anoncreds-clsignatures
- Affected
- < 0.1.0
- Fixed in
- 0.1.0
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-6698-mhxx-r84g lists affected ranges: crates.io ursa >=0 =0 <0.1.0
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 6.5 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- EPSS
- CVE-2024-22192: 0.32% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 24.65 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Summary The revocation scheme that is part of the Ursa CL-Signatures implementations has a flaw that could impact the privacy guarantees defined by the AnonCreds verifiable credential model. Notably, a malicious verifier may be able to generate a unique identifier for a holder providing a verifiable presentation that includes a Non-Revocation proof. Details The revocation scheme that is part of the Ursa CL-Signatures implementations has a flaw that could impact the privacy guarantees defined by the AnonCreds verifiable credential model, potentially allowing a malicious verifier to generate a unique identifier for a holder that provides a verifiable presentation that includes a Non-Revocation proof. The flaws affects all CL-Signature versions published from the [Hyperledger Ursa] repository to the [Ursa Rust Crate], and is fixed in all versions published from the [Hyperledger AnonCreds CL-Signatures] repository to the [AnonCreds CL-Signatures Rust Crate]. The addressing the flaw…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-6698-mhxx-r84g
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2024-22192 Advisory: Ursa CL-Signatures Revocation allows verifiers to generate unique identifiers for holders IDs: CVE-2024-22192, GHSA-6698-mhxx-r84g Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2024-22192 (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 15:38 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Medium (CVSS 6.5) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Partial vendor fix; fixed versions by package: anoncreds-clsignatures 0.1.0. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - crates.io ursa: affected <= 0.3.7 - crates.io anoncreds-clsignatures: affected < 0.1.0; fixed in 0.1.0 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - crates.io ursa: check the installed version with your package manager. - crates.io anoncreds-clsignatures: check the installed version with your package manager. ## Supported action No complete vendor fix is recorded. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check this record again before closing anything. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on ursa, anoncreds-clsignatures. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-6698-mhxx-r84g (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-6698-mhxx-r84g lists affected ranges: crates.io ursa >=0 =0 <0.1.0) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…