PYSEC-2025-240
What to do
Vendor response not established. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check back for a fix.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
PyPI copyparty
- Affected
- <= 1.9.1
- Fixed in
- no fixed version recorded
Sources
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record PYSEC-2025-240 lists affected ranges: PyPI copyparty >=0 <=1.9.1
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; not marked as GitHub-reviewed.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 7.8 · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- EPSS
- CVE-2023-41471: 0.27% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 19.64 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Cross Site Scripting vulnerability in copyparty before 1.9.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted payload to the WEEKEND-PLANS function. NOTE: this is disputed because WEEKEND-PLANS is accessible only to actors who already have write access to the server, and they can more simply upload HTML files containing JavaScript.
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record PYSEC-2025-240
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2023-41471 Advisory: PYSEC-2025-240 IDs: CVE-2023-41471 Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2023-41471 (revision 1, source checked 24 Oct 2026, 04:13 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: High (CVSS 7.8) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor response not established. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - PyPI copyparty: affected <= 1.9.1 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `python -m pip show copyparty`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active. ## Supported action No complete vendor fix is recorded. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check this record again before closing anything. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on copyparty. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/PYSEC-2025-240 (OSV record PYSEC-2025-240 lists affected ranges: PyPI copyparty >=0 <=1.9.1) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…