Skip to content

← Actionable
High, CVSS 7.1amended

Planet's secret file is created with excessive permissions

CVE-2023-32303GHSA-j5fj-rfh6-qj85

What to do

Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (planet 2.0.1), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.

This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.

Affected packages

  • PyPI planet

    Affected
    < 2.0.1
    Fixed in
    2.0.1

Sources

Severity and exploitation
Exploitation
No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
CVSS 4.0
7.1 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N · score source
EPSS
  • CVE-2023-32303: 0.25% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 16.81 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description

As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.

Impact The secret file stores the user's Planet API authentication information. It should only be accessible by the user, but its permissions allowed the user's group and non-group to read the file as well. Validation Check the permissions on the secret file with ls -l ~/.planet.json and ensure that they read as -rw------- Patches d71415a8 Workarounds Set the secret file permissions to only user read/write by hand:

Dates and revisions
Published by the source
Last modified by the source
Source last checked
  1. Revision 3 · amended ·

    Amended from ghsa record GHSA-j5fj-rfh6-qj85

  2. Revision 2 · amended ·

    Reviewed OSV alias/range/CVSS4 correction; package source scopes and original publication preserved. No customer finding resolved.

  3. Revision 1 · created ·

    Published from osv record GHSA-j5fj-rfh6-qj85

Agent brief

Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.

# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2023-32303

Advisory: Planet's secret file is created with excessive permissions
IDs: CVE-2023-32303, GHSA-j5fj-rfh6-qj85
Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2023-32303 (revision 3, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:21 UTC)
Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected.
Severity: High (CVSS 7.1)
Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV.
Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: planet 2.0.1. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed.

## Affected components
- PyPI planet: affected < 2.0.1; fixed in 2.0.1

## Suggested inspection (read-only)
- `python -m pip show planet`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active.

## Supported action
Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version.

## Required regression checks
- Run the test suite and a production build.
- Exercise the features that depend on planet.
- Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed.

## Rollback considerations
- Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward.

## Unresolved questions
- Which deployments run an affected version?
- Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority.
- Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production.

## Sources
- Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-j5fj-rfh6-qj85 (OSV record GHSA-j5fj-rfh6-qj85 lists affected ranges: PyPI planet >=0 <2.0.1 (fixed))
- Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-j5fj-rfh6-qj85 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-j5fj-rfh6-qj85 lists affected ranges: PyPI planet >=0 <2.0.1)

Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.

Loading voting…