Skip to content

← Actionable
Medium, CVSS 5.3

OutOfMemoryError for large multipart without filename in Eclipse Jetty

CVE-2023-26048GHSA-qw69-rqj8-6qw8

What to do

Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server 11.0.14, 10.0.14, 9.4.51.v20230217), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.

This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.

Affected packages

Sources

Severity and exploitation
Exploitation
No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
CVSS
5.3 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
EPSS
  • CVE-2023-26048: 3.37% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 88.77 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description

As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.

Impact Servlets with multipart support (e.g. annotated with @MultipartConfig) that call HttpServletRequest.getParameter() or HttpServletRequest.getParts() may cause OutOfMemoryError when the client sends a multipart request with a part that has a name but no filename and a very large content. This happens even with the default settings of fileSizeThreshold=0 which should stream the whole part content to disk. An attacker client may send a large multipart request and cause the server to throw OutOfMemoryError. However, the server may be able to recover after the OutOfMemoryError and continue its service -- although it may take some time. A very large number of parts may cause the same problem. Patches Patched in Jetty versions 9.4.51.v20230217 - via PR #9345 10.0.14 - via PR #9344 11.0.14 - via PR #9344 Workarounds Multipart parameter maxRequestSize must be set to a non-negative value, so the whole multipart content is limited (although still read into memory). Limiting multipart…

Dates and revisions
Published by the source
Last modified by the source
Source last checked
  1. Revision 1 · created ·

    Published from ghsa record GHSA-qw69-rqj8-6qw8

Agent brief

Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.

# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2023-26048

Advisory: OutOfMemoryError for large multipart without filename in Eclipse Jetty
IDs: CVE-2023-26048, GHSA-qw69-rqj8-6qw8
Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2023-26048 (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 16:16 UTC)
Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected.
Severity: Medium (CVSS 5.3)
Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV.
Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server 11.0.14, 10.0.14, 9.4.51.v20230217. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed.

## Affected components
- Maven org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server: affected >= 10.0.0, < 10.0.14; >= 11.0.0, < 11.0.14; < 9.4.51.v20230217; fixed in 11.0.14, 9.4.51.v20230217, 10.0.14

## Suggested inspection (read-only)
- Maven org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server: check the installed version with your package manager.

## Supported action
Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version.

## Required regression checks
- Run the test suite and a production build.
- Exercise the features that depend on org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server.
- Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed.

## Rollback considerations
- Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward.

## Unresolved questions
- Which deployments run an affected version?
- Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority.
- Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production.

## Sources
- Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qw69-rqj8-6qw8 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-qw69-rqj8-6qw8 lists affected ranges: Maven org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server >=10.0.0 =11.0.0 =0 <9.4.51.v20230217)

Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.

Loading voting…