openssl-src subject to Timing Oracle in RSA Decryption
CVE-2022-4304GHSA-p52g-cm5j-mjv4
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (openssl-src 300.0.12, 111.25.0), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
crates.io openssl-src
- Affected
- < 111.25.0>= 300.0.0, < 300.0.12
- Fixed in
- 111.25.0, 300.0.12
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-p52g-cm5j-mjv4 lists affected ranges: crates.io openssl-src >=0 =300.0.0 <300.0.12
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 5.9 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- EPSS
- CVE-2022-4304: 23.51% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 97.80 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
A timing based side channel exists in the OpenSSL RSA Decryption implementation which could be sufficient to recover a plaintext across a network in a Bleichenbacher style attack. To achieve a successful decryption an attacker would have to be able to send a very large number of trial messages for decryption. The vulnerability affects all RSA padding modes: PKCS#1 v1.5, RSA-OEAP and RSASVE. For example, in a TLS connection, RSA is commonly used by a client to send an encrypted pre-master secret to the server. An attacker that had observed a genuine connection between a client and a server could use this flaw to send trial messages to the server and record the time taken to process them. After a sufficiently large number of messages the attacker could recover the pre-master secret used for the original connection and thus be able to decrypt the application data sent over that connection.
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-p52g-cm5j-mjv4
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2022-4304 Advisory: openssl-src subject to Timing Oracle in RSA Decryption IDs: CVE-2022-4304, GHSA-p52g-cm5j-mjv4 Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2022-4304 (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 15:39 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Medium (CVSS 5.9) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: openssl-src 300.0.12, 111.25.0. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - crates.io openssl-src: affected < 111.25.0; >= 300.0.0, < 300.0.12; fixed in 111.25.0, 300.0.12 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - crates.io openssl-src: check the installed version with your package manager. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on openssl-src. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-p52g-cm5j-mjv4 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-p52g-cm5j-mjv4 lists affected ranges: crates.io openssl-src >=0 =300.0.0 <300.0.12) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…