Wasmtime may have data leakage between instances in the pooling allocator
CVE-2022-39393GHSA-wh6w-3828-g9qf
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (wasmtime 2.0.2, 1.0.2), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
crates.io wasmtime
- Affected
- >= 2.0.0, < 2.0.2< 1.0.2
- Fixed in
- 1.0.2, 2.0.2
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-wh6w-3828-g9qf lists affected ranges: crates.io wasmtime >=2.0.0 =0 <1.0.2
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 8.6 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
- EPSS
- CVE-2022-39393: 0.75% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 55.14 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Impact There is a bug in Wasmtime's implementation of it's pooling instance allocator where when a linear memory is reused for another instance the initial heap snapshot of the prior instance can be visible, erroneously to the next instance. The pooling instance allocator in Wasmtime works by preallocating virtual memory for a fixed number of instances to reside in and then new instantiations pick a slot to use. Most conventional modules additionally have an initial copy-on-write "heap image" which is mapped in Wasmtime into the linear memory slot. When a heap slot is deallocated Wasmtime resets all of its contents back to the initial state but it does not unmap the image in case the next instance is an instantiation of the same module. The bug in Wasmtime occurs when a slot in the pooling allocator previously was used for a module with a heap image, meaning that its current state of memory contains the initial heap contents of that module. If the next instantiation within that slot…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-wh6w-3828-g9qf
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2022-39393 Advisory: Wasmtime may have data leakage between instances in the pooling allocator IDs: CVE-2022-39393, GHSA-wh6w-3828-g9qf Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2022-39393 (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 15:38 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: High (CVSS 8.6) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: wasmtime 2.0.2, 1.0.2. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - crates.io wasmtime: affected >= 2.0.0, < 2.0.2; < 1.0.2; fixed in 1.0.2, 2.0.2 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - crates.io wasmtime: check the installed version with your package manager. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on wasmtime. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-wh6w-3828-g9qf (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-wh6w-3828-g9qf lists affected ranges: crates.io wasmtime >=2.0.0 =0 <1.0.2) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…