Signature forgery in Biscuit
CVE-2022-31053GHSA-75rw-34q6-72cr
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (biscuit-auth 2.0.0; github.com/biscuit-auth/biscuit-go 2.0.0; com.clever-cloud:biscuit-java 2.0.0), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
crates.io biscuit-auth
- Affected
- >= 1.0.0, < 2.0.0
- Fixed in
- 2.0.0
Go github.com/biscuit-auth/biscuit-go
- Affected
- < 2.0.0
- Fixed in
- 2.0.0
Maven com.clever-cloud:biscuit-java
- Affected
- < 2.0.0
- Fixed in
- 2.0.0
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-75rw-34q6-72cr lists affected ranges: crates.io biscuit-auth >=1.0.0 =0 =0 <2.0.0
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 9.8 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- EPSS
- CVE-2022-31053: 1.03% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 63.66 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Impact The paper Cryptanalysis of Aggregate Γ-Signature and Practical Countermeasures in Application to Bitcoin defines a way to forge valid Γ-signatures, an algorithm that is used in the Biscuit specification version 1. It would allow an attacker to create a token with any access level. As Biscuit v1 was still an early version and not broadly deployed, we were able to contact all known users of Biscuit v1 and help them migrate to Biscuit v2. We are not aware of any active exploitation of this vulnerability. Patches The version 2 of the specification mandates a different algorithm than gamma signatures and as such is not affected by this vulnerability. The Biscuit implementations in Rust, Haskell, Go, Java and Javascript all have published versions following the v2 specification. Workarounds There is no known workaround, any use of Biscuit v1 should be migrated to v2. References Cryptanalysis of Aggregate Γ-Signature and Practical Countermeasures in Application to Bitcoin For more…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-75rw-34q6-72cr
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2022-31053 Advisory: Signature forgery in Biscuit IDs: CVE-2022-31053, GHSA-75rw-34q6-72cr Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2022-31053 (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 14:55 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Critical (CVSS 9.8) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: biscuit-auth 2.0.0; github.com/biscuit-auth/biscuit-go 2.0.0; com.clever-cloud:biscuit-java 2.0.0. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - crates.io biscuit-auth: affected >= 1.0.0, < 2.0.0; fixed in 2.0.0 - Go github.com/biscuit-auth/biscuit-go: affected < 2.0.0; fixed in 2.0.0 - Maven com.clever-cloud:biscuit-java: affected < 2.0.0; fixed in 2.0.0 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - crates.io biscuit-auth: check the installed version with your package manager. - Go github.com/biscuit-auth/biscuit-go: check the installed version with your package manager. - Maven com.clever-cloud:biscuit-java: check the installed version with your package manager. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on biscuit-auth, github.com/biscuit-auth/biscuit-go, com.clever-cloud:biscuit-java. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-75rw-34q6-72cr (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-75rw-34q6-72cr lists affected ranges: crates.io biscuit-auth >=1.0.0 =0 =0 <2.0.0) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…