Access control issue in AlekSIS-Core
CVE-2022-29773GHSA-76x2-h8h3-cwjg
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (aleksis-core 2.9), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
PyPI aleksis-core
- Affected
- < 2.9
- Fixed in
- 2.9
Sources
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-76x2-h8h3-cwjg lists affected ranges: PyPI aleksis-core >=0 <2.9 (fixed)
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-76x2-h8h3-cwjg lists affected ranges: PyPI aleksis-core >=0 <2.9
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 6.5 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- EPSS
- CVE-2022-29773: 0.73% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 54.31 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
An access control issue in aleksis/core/util/authhelpers.py: ClientProtectedResourceMixin of AlekSIS-Core v2.8.1 and below allows attackers to access arbitrary scopes if no allowed scopes are specifically set.
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-76x2-h8h3-cwjg
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record GHSA-76x2-h8h3-cwjg
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2022-29773 Advisory: Access control issue in AlekSIS-Core IDs: CVE-2022-29773, GHSA-76x2-h8h3-cwjg Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2022-29773 (revision 2, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:08 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Medium (CVSS 6.5) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: aleksis-core 2.9. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - PyPI aleksis-core: affected < 2.9; fixed in 2.9 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `python -m pip show aleksis-core`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on aleksis-core. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-76x2-h8h3-cwjg (OSV record GHSA-76x2-h8h3-cwjg lists affected ranges: PyPI aleksis-core >=0 <2.9 (fixed)) - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-76x2-h8h3-cwjg (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-76x2-h8h3-cwjg lists affected ranges: PyPI aleksis-core >=0 <2.9) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…