HTML Injection in Froxlor
CVE-2020-29653GHSA-j739-gw6q-f4c7
What to do
Vendor response not established. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check back for a fix.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
Packagist froxlor/froxlor
- Affected
- <= 0.10.22
- Fixed in
- no fixed version recorded
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-j739-gw6q-f4c7 lists affected ranges: Packagist froxlor/froxlor >=0 <=0.10.22
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 6.1 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
- EPSS
- CVE-2020-29653: 1.43% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 73.07 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Froxlor through 0.10.22 does not perform validation on user input passed in the customermail GET parameter. The value of this parameter is reflected in the login webpage, allowing the injection of arbitrary HTML tags. Note: Froxlor version 0.10.22 introduces AntiXSS cross-site scripting protection, but AntiXSS only provides partial protection for this particular issue.
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-j739-gw6q-f4c7
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2020-29653 Advisory: HTML Injection in Froxlor IDs: CVE-2020-29653, GHSA-j739-gw6q-f4c7 Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2020-29653 (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:59 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Medium (CVSS 6.1) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor response not established. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - Packagist froxlor/froxlor: affected <= 0.10.22 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - Packagist froxlor/froxlor: check the installed version with your package manager. ## Supported action No complete vendor fix is recorded. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check this record again before closing anything. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on froxlor/froxlor. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-j739-gw6q-f4c7 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-j739-gw6q-f4c7 lists affected ranges: Packagist froxlor/froxlor >=0 <=0.10.22) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…