Skip to content

← Actionable
Medium, CVSS 5.9

SilverStripe Web Cache Poisoning through HTTPRequestBuilder

CVE-2019-19326GHSA-q9ff-3q93-fm8m

What to do

Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (silverstripe/framework 4.5.4, 4.4.7, 3.7.5), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.

This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.

Affected packages

  • Packagist silverstripe/framework

    Affected
    >= 4.0.0, < 4.4.7>= 4.5.0, < 4.5.4>= 3.0.0, < 3.7.5
    Fixed in
    4.4.7, 4.5.4, 3.7.5

Sources

Severity and exploitation
Exploitation
No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
CVSS
5.9 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
EPSS
  • CVE-2019-19326: 0.76% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 55.27 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description

As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.

SilverStripe through 4.4.4 allows Web Cache Poisoning through HTTPRequestBuilder.

Dates and revisions
Published by the source
Last modified by the source
Source last checked
  1. Revision 1 · created ·

    Published from ghsa record GHSA-q9ff-3q93-fm8m

Agent brief

Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.

# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2019-19326

Advisory: SilverStripe Web Cache Poisoning through HTTPRequestBuilder
IDs: CVE-2019-19326, GHSA-q9ff-3q93-fm8m
Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2019-19326 (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 14:24 UTC)
Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected.
Severity: Medium (CVSS 5.9)
Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV.
Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: silverstripe/framework 4.5.4, 4.4.7, 3.7.5. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed.

## Affected components
- Packagist silverstripe/framework: affected >= 4.0.0, < 4.4.7; >= 4.5.0, < 4.5.4; >= 3.0.0, < 3.7.5; fixed in 4.4.7, 4.5.4, 3.7.5

## Suggested inspection (read-only)
- Packagist silverstripe/framework: check the installed version with your package manager.

## Supported action
Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version.

## Required regression checks
- Run the test suite and a production build.
- Exercise the features that depend on silverstripe/framework.
- Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed.

## Rollback considerations
- Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward.

## Unresolved questions
- Which deployments run an affected version?
- Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority.
- Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production.

## Sources
- Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-q9ff-3q93-fm8m (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-q9ff-3q93-fm8m lists affected ranges: Packagist silverstripe/framework >=4.0.0 =4.5.0 =3.0.0 <3.7.5)

Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.

Loading voting…