Pterodactyl vulnerable to 2FA Sniffing
CVE-2019-1020002GHSA-fg52-xjfc-9rh8
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (pterodactyl/panel 0.7.14), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
Packagist pterodactyl/panel
- Affected
- <= 0.7.13
- Fixed in
- 0.7.14
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-fg52-xjfc-9rh8 lists affected ranges: Packagist pterodactyl/panel >=0 <=0.7.13
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 7.5 · CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- EPSS
- CVE-2019-1020002: 1.47% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 73.86 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Pterodactyl version 0.7.13 and lower - 2FA Sniffing Users who have enabled 2FA protections on their account can unintentionally have their account's existence sniffed by malicious users who enter random credentials into the login fields. Impact Users who have enabled 2FA protections on their account can unintentionally have their account's existence sniffed by malicious users who enter random credentials into the login fields. A logical mistake was made when the original code was written that would wait to verify the user's password until they had provided 2FA credentials if it was enabled on their account. However, because of this you could enter a bad password for a known email and determine if the account exists if you got redirected to a 2FA page. For more information If you have any questions or comments about this advisory please react out on Discord or email dane@[project name].io.
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-fg52-xjfc-9rh8
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2019-1020002 Advisory: Pterodactyl vulnerable to 2FA Sniffing IDs: CVE-2019-1020002, GHSA-fg52-xjfc-9rh8 Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2019-1020002 (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 14:04 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: High (CVSS 7.5) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: pterodactyl/panel 0.7.14. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - Packagist pterodactyl/panel: affected <= 0.7.13; fixed in 0.7.14 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - Packagist pterodactyl/panel: check the installed version with your package manager. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on pterodactyl/panel. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-fg52-xjfc-9rh8 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-fg52-xjfc-9rh8 lists affected ranges: Packagist pterodactyl/panel >=0 <=0.7.13) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…