python-jose failure to use a constant time comparison for HMAC keys
CVE-2016-7036GHSA-w799-prg3-cx77
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (python-jose 1.3.2), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
PyPI python-jose
- Affected
- < 1.3.2
- Fixed in
- 1.3.2
Sources
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-w799-prg3-cx77 lists affected ranges: PyPI python-jose >=0 <1.3.2 (fixed)
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-w799-prg3-cx77 lists affected ranges: PyPI python-jose >=0 <1.3.2
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 9.8 · CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- EPSS
- CVE-2016-7036: 2.17% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 82.30 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
python-jose before 1.3.2 allows attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging failure to use a constant time comparison for HMAC keys.
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-w799-prg3-cx77
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record GHSA-w799-prg3-cx77
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2016-7036 Advisory: python-jose failure to use a constant time comparison for HMAC keys IDs: CVE-2016-7036, GHSA-w799-prg3-cx77 Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2016-7036 (revision 2, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:22 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Critical (CVSS 9.8) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: python-jose 1.3.2. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - PyPI python-jose: affected < 1.3.2; fixed in 1.3.2 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `python -m pip show python-jose`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on python-jose. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-w799-prg3-cx77 (OSV record GHSA-w799-prg3-cx77 lists affected ranges: PyPI python-jose >=0 <1.3.2 (fixed)) - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-w799-prg3-cx77 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-w799-prg3-cx77 lists affected ranges: PyPI python-jose >=0 <1.3.2) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…