Silverstripe CMS Open Redirect
CVE-2015-5062GHSA-fh35-p8ph-p545
What to do
Vendor response not established. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check back for a fix.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
Packagist silverstripe/cms
- Affected
- <= 3.1.13
- Fixed in
- no fixed version recorded
Packagist silverstripe/framework
- Affected
- <= 3.1.13
- Fixed in
- no fixed version recorded
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-fh35-p8ph-p545 lists affected ranges: Packagist silverstripe/cms >=0 =0 <=3.1.13
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- not scored
- EPSS
- CVE-2015-5062: 2.01% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 80.90 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Open redirect vulnerability in SilverStripe CMS & Framework 3.1.13 allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via a URL in the returnURL parameter to dev/build.
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-fh35-p8ph-p545
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2015-5062 Advisory: Silverstripe CMS Open Redirect IDs: CVE-2015-5062, GHSA-fh35-p8ph-p545 Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2015-5062 (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 14:06 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Unrated Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor response not established. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - Packagist silverstripe/cms: affected <= 3.1.13 - Packagist silverstripe/framework: affected <= 3.1.13 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - Packagist silverstripe/cms: check the installed version with your package manager. - Packagist silverstripe/framework: check the installed version with your package manager. ## Supported action No complete vendor fix is recorded. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check this record again before closing anything. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on silverstripe/cms, silverstripe/framework. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-fh35-p8ph-p545 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-fh35-p8ph-p545 lists affected ranges: Packagist silverstripe/cms >=0 =0 <=3.1.13) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…