Py2Play Unpickles Untrusted Objects
CVE-2005-2875GHSA-wcpc-f63g-x26q
What to do
Vendor response not established. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check back for a fix.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
PyPI py2play
- Affected
- <= 0.1.8
- Fixed in
- no fixed version recorded
Sources
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-wcpc-f63g-x26q lists affected ranges: PyPI py2play >=0 <=0.1.8
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-wcpc-f63g-x26q lists affected ranges: PyPI py2play >=0 <=0.1.8
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- not scored
- EPSS
- CVE-2005-2875: 1.91% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 79.77 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Py2Play allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Python code via pickled objects, which Py2Play unpickles and executes.
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-wcpc-f63g-x26q
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record GHSA-wcpc-f63g-x26q
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2005-2875 Advisory: Py2Play Unpickles Untrusted Objects IDs: CVE-2005-2875, GHSA-wcpc-f63g-x26q Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2005-2875 (revision 2, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:12 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Unrated Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor response not established. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - PyPI py2play: affected <= 0.1.8 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `python -m pip show py2play`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active. ## Supported action No complete vendor fix is recorded. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check this record again before closing anything. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on py2play. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-wcpc-f63g-x26q (OSV record GHSA-wcpc-f63g-x26q lists affected ranges: PyPI py2play >=0 <=0.1.8) - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-wcpc-f63g-x26q (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-wcpc-f63g-x26q lists affected ranges: PyPI py2play >=0 <=0.1.8) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…